top of page

Artist Statement

My performative painting practice explores the interactions between the body movement and the calligraphic brushstroke to compose a pictorial narrative within an architectural and scenic space.  I search to extend the fluidity, architectural structure and kinesthetics of calligraphic brushstrokes to the body moving in an architectural and scenic space.  I use intuitive and spontaneous gestures to create a gestural narrative, inspired largely by running script and chirashi-gaki calligraphy, graffiti, cave paintings, dance improvisation, ballet, and gestural abstraction. 

 

Why is there a need for a painting to be presented within the boundaries of a frame? For the creators of the Nasca lines, they may find the phenomenon of putting a painting inside an Albertian’s window frame somewhat strange.  I am interested in a type of painting that can allow the viewer to wander throughout the space, like the way our eyes wander when we are walking in a forest.

 

My interest in the picture frame and performative painting has led me to take a more in depth look at how the Italian proscenium stage or “picture frame” stage was inspired by the Albertian window and how modern and postmodern developments in the scenic space have disrupted the picture frame stage, from Adolphe Appia’s departure from the bidimensional perspectival scenery to a three dimensional modular scenery, to the rotation of the horizontal plane as seen in Trisha Brown’s vertical dance plane, to the destruction of the fourth wall through audience-performer interactions in Tino Sehgal’s work.

 

According to Arnold Aronson, “the history of scenography in its simplest terms can be described as a pendulum swinging between space and image.” (1) Then, I would like to point out that painting has also become more scenographic in a modern and post-modern sense, that is, a departure from the picture frame, from Daniel Buren’s expansion of the pictorial space onto the architectural plane to Katarina Grosse’s questioning of a painting’s flatness through the mise en scène of three dimensional structures in a spatial field, and their transformation using color.   

 

In my new painting Purple Swan (2022), I would like to put forth a different idea in painting called the tableau scénique. It would operate in the reverse sense of Diderot’s “tableau vivant,” where the staging of a scene imitates a pictorial representation. The tableau scénique would have performative or scenographic elements, or both, it is thus a type of painting, where a pictorial narrative operates in the logic of a mise en scène of performative painting. The scenic space integrates the architectural space and scenic interventions using a post-Appian approach, allowing for freedom of movement of the calligraphic brushstroke in a three dimensional space, beyond the canvas frame. 

  1. ARONSON Arnold, « The Future of Scenography », Theater Design & Technology, Vol. 46 No. 1 (Winter 10), p. 84.

近期展覽

本繪畫創作旨在探討身體動作之於動覺性筆觸及舞台性空間之間的互動,與其所建構的圖像敘事。以書法為筆法起點,將書法的流動性、建築結構及動覺性,延伸到肢體動作並且強調與空間的互動。透過直覺及即興肢體動作,將身體潛藏的意象表現於姿態性筆畫,並延伸到建築及舞台性的三維空間。 創作方法取自:(包括但不限於)行書、光悅書流、塗鴉、石窟壁畫、姿態抽象、即興舞蹈、芭蕾舞蹈等等。

 

在書法創作的範疇中,運筆有著不同動作如:行筆、提筆、頓筆及轉筆。但當筆法轉換到三維空間時,轉筆的動作會需要用身體的旋轉動作來帶動轉筆的筆觸。手腕跟手臂的行筆動作會轉換成沿著牆面行走的動作。頓筆的力道則是用膝蓋往下微蹲來將身體的中心放在收筆的方向。

 

畫者同時也對於「為什麼繪畫要被圖框的邊界限制著?」這個藝術創作議題感到興趣,並想深入研究之;在阿爾貝蒂之窗(Albertian window) 將繪畫認定在畫框裡面,但當我們以納斯卡線的創作者的角度來看,或許可能會對此感到奇怪。筆者認為創作沉浸式的空間繪畫,讓觀者能夠在圖畫空間裡流動性的觀看並與自己的淺意識對話,像我們在森林遊走時自由飄動的觀看風景。

 

於是,畫者嘗試更深入的探究義大利鏡框式舞台或圖框舞台是如何被阿爾貝蒂之窗所影響,以及後現代舞台及表演空間的發展如何突破阿爾貝蒂之窗的框架。可以看到阿匹亞脫離二維的圖框透視舞台,引入三維模組化的舞台設計,特里莎‧布朗(Trisha Brown, 1936-2017)試圖將舞台的水平面旋轉成垂直舞台,以及蒂諾‧塞加爾(Tino Sehgal)透過觀眾與表演者的互動打破第四道牆,皆是脫離阿爾貝蒂之窗的框架的例子。美國劇場史學者阿諾德‧阿隆森(Arnold Aronson)曾指出:「舞台設計的歷史(History of scenography)可以被描述成一個在影像跟空間迴盪的垂擺。」

 

畫者在此研究之中觀察到,綜觀近-當代繪畫趨勢也逐漸脫離圖框,而從一個現代主義及後現代主義角度,舞台氛圍化(scenographic)日益著重。如法國藝術家丹尼爾‧布罕(Daniel Buren)將圖像空間延伸到建築層面,或德國藝術家卡塔琳娜•格羅斯(Katarina Grosse)如何透過三維結構物在空間場的場面調度(mise en scène )及運用顏色將其轉換,去探問繪畫的平面性與之存在關係。

2022 年 Purple Swan 繪畫創作推出舞台性繪畫(tableau scénique)的概念,與德尼·狄德羅(Denis Diderot, 1713-1784)的活人畫的機制相異。 舞台性繪畫有著表演性及舞台性的元素,而繪畫的圖像敘事是由表演性繪畫的場面調度所建立。舞台性空間(scenic space)是由建築空間與後阿匹亞的舞台性元素的介入所構成,讓動覺性繪畫可以透過身體及肢體動作自由發揮於三維的舞台性空間,超越畫框。

 

註1:ARONSON Arnold, « The Future of Scenography », Theater Design & Technology, Vol. 46 No. 1 (Winter 10), p. 84.

© 2016 by Wang Yi-Wei Proudly created with Wix.com

  • Instagram
  • Facebook Social Icon
bottom of page